Spine. 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1658-65
	       
	      Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated
	      intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance
	      imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis. 
	       
	      Guehring T, Omlor GW, Lorenz H, Engelleiter K, Richter W, Carstens C,
	      Kroeber M. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
	      
	       
	      STUDY DESIGN: An animal model of degeneration was used to determine
	      the effects of disc distraction, and was evaluated with magnetic resonance
	      imaging (MRI) as well as gene and protein expression levels. 
	       
	      OBJECTIVE: To investigate gene expression and MRI effects of distraction.
	      
	       
	      SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc degeneration can result from
	      hyper-physiologic loading. Distracted discs with degeneration showed histologic
	      signs of tissue recovery. 
	       
	      METHODS: There were 18 rabbits that underwent 28 days of compression
	      (200 N) to induce moderate disc degeneration followed by 28 days of distraction
	      (120 N; attached and loaded distraction device) or sham distraction (attached
	      but unloaded distraction device). Comparison was performed with 56 days of
	      compressed discs without distraction. Quantitative outcome measures were
	      MRI signal intensity and gene expression analysis to determine: messenger
	      ribonucleic acid levels for extracellular matrix genes, including collagen
	      1, collagen 2, biglycan, decorin, aggrecan, fibromodulin, and osteonectin;
	      and matrix-regulative genes, including matrix metalloproteinase-13,
	      tissue-inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, and bone morphogenetic protein
	      (BMP)-2. Immunohistology was performed for collagen 2 and BMP-2 to label
	      cells semiquantitatively by staining of the cell-surrounding matrix. 
	       
	      RESULTS: A total of 28 days of compression decreased signal intensity.
	      Distraction over the same period reestablished physiologic signal intensity,
	      however, a persistent reduction was found in sham distraction. Distraction
	      resulted in gene expression up-regulation of collagen 1 (5.4-fold), collagen
	      2 (5.5-fold), biglycan (7.7-fold), and decorin (3.4-fold), while expression
	      of fibromodulin (0.16-fold), tissue-inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1
	      (0.05-fold), and BMP-2 (0.15-fold) was decreased, as compared with 56 days
	      compression. Distracted discs showed more BMP-2 (19.67 vs. 3.67 in 56 days
	      compression) and collagen 2 (18.67 vs. 11.33 in 56 days compression) positive
	      cells per field. 
	       
	      CONCLUSIONS: Distraction results in disc rehydration, stimulated
	      extracellular matrix gene expression, and increased numbers of protein-expressing
	      cells.
	       
	      Back to Home Page        
	                 
	       Back to Research Page
	       
	      	 
			 
			To Talk to a Doctor or  
			Schedule an Appointment, Call
			
			 
			252-430-8000
			 
			 
			 EMAIL US WITH ANY
			QUESTIONS
			 
			Henderson Wellness Center
			 
			414 Dabney Drive
			 
			Henderson, NC 27536
			 
			 
	       
	       If our office is too far, we still want to help you.  
	      Go to DecompressionUSA.com
	      to locate  
	      Decompression Doctors all across the country.  |